https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/bd/lifestyle/art/jilted-lover-fights-back-structure-of-play-confuses-3712944
JILTED LOVER FIGHTS BACK AS STRUCTURE OF PLAY CONFUSES
By
Margaretta wa Gacheru (Pbublished online february 10, 2022)
First-time
playwright Christine Yohannes took an original approach to her production which
was staged this past weekend at the Kenya Cultural Centre.
Ironically
entitled ‘Total Distraction’, the show is all about a classic story that is
unfortunately universal. It’s about a young woman who has been betrayed by a
Casanova whose specialty is cheating every beautiful woman he can find. He
first seduces her with sweet assurances of her being his only one, after which
he dumps her. In this case, Majida (Sheila Kariuki) has been impregnated by
Alandre (Ephantus Kuria) and at eight months, she is close to having the child.
But Majida
has no thought for what will become of the child if its mother goes to jail for
life. She is only intent on bumping off Alandre for having ruined her life. She
is out for revenge, and it’s apparent that she believes she will ‘reclaim her
power’ after having lost it due to the duplicity and dishonesty of Alandre.
The story is
spiced up by the inclusion first of Alandre’s former financee Clare (Jean
Gloria) who takes her time trying to convince Majida she would be making a huge
mistake by killing the guy.
The other
woman who plays her part in actually amping up Majida’s desire to finish the
guy is Mila (Faith Wambui). She is Alandre’s current girl friend who seems well
aware of her boyfriend’s cruel technique of collecting women for sexual
partnership only to dump them once they make demands, like be faithful, honest,
responsible, and caring. Mila apparently knows he is a Casanova, but doesn’t
mind playing with his fire.
I don’t have
a problem with the central theme of the play or with the acting or the
directing. What I couldn’t understand was the role of the narrator. I was told
it should be seen as an innovative and new approach to theatre, that it’s a new
style of performance. But I still have questions.
My first
question is: Wasn’t this approach, of the acting being echoed by the reading,
redundant?
I wonder if
anyone was as confused by this technique as I was? I mean narrators have a role
to play, for instance, when there is a need to introduce a story, play, film,
or drama of some sort. But that type of narrator usually speaks before the
story, and steps back for the cast to dramatize the work by themselves.
I initially wondered
whether I wasn’t watching the rehearsal of a play, as in ‘a play within a play’?
No, that wasn’t the idea.
I wonder if it was to ensure that we the audience knew what was going on. For instance, if you don’t speak Chinese, but you like to watch Chinese movies, you are happy to have sub-titles. Otherwise, if the actors can tell the story with their body language, one may feel there is no need for sub-titles; and so they get in the way of one’s full enjoyment of the action movie.
Perhaps the
playwright felt the actors wouldn’t be able to convey the full development of
her characters. Perhaps she felt the audience would be lost without having the
full text of the play disclosed to them. Perhaps it was meant to be a courtesy
so we would understand the depth of her characters’ feelings. Especially
Majida’s who was so angry about Alandre’s getting off scot-free after having
ruined her life that she was prepared to sacrifice her own.
In the end,
we might assume that ‘Total Distraction’ ends as a cliff-hanger since the lights
go out, and then three gunshots go off. Yet we can be pretty assured that
Majida shot the guy in the end. What is peculiar is that at that point, the
narrator should have been speaking, and telling us what the playwright really
intended to have happen in those last few moments. Instead, I believe the
narrator was silent. When we might have needed her most to clarify what
actually happened to Alandre and whether the writer wanted us to feel that
Majida had ‘reclaimed her power’ by destroying his.
Either way,
we must congratulate Christine for her courage to try something new.
No comments:
Post a Comment